Orders and supply chain / Workflow UC007

Delivery-dispute evidence pack

Reconstruct what was shipped and delivered so a person can resolve a missing-delivery claim.

An illustrative workflow design. Explore its steps, inputs, human decisions and intended outcome.

The work and the outcome

Evidence sits in carrier portals and warehouse files; missing links delay resolution.

What a useful result looks like

Claims ticket contains indexed evidence pack, unresolved gaps and named owner; resolution decision remains human.

Business function
Delivery claims
Typical sponsor
Head of logistics
Working role
Delivery claims coordinator
Unit of work
delivery dispute
How this work typically happens today
  1. Locate invoice/order
  2. Collect pick, dispatch, tracking and POD records
  3. Reconcile dates and quantities
  4. Submit evidence and assign investigation

How the workflow could run

AI helps prepare and coordinate the work. The review rules define what can proceed and where an accountable person decides.

  1. 01

    Receive the trigger

    Customer disputes delivery, count or delivery location.

  2. 02

    Bring the right context together

    Shipment evidence graph with access controls for signatures and addresses.

  3. 03

    Prepare the work with AI

    Join order, load and POD identifiers; extract signed quantities and timestamps; flag inconsistent locations/counts; draft chronology.

  4. 04

    Review and authorize

    Assess disputed signatures, fraud and liability; contact carrier/customer; approve settlement or rejection.

  5. 05

    Confirm the outcome

    Claims ticket contains indexed evidence pack, unresolved gaps and named owner; resolution decision remains human.

The review experience

Shipment timeline with document previews and discrepancy flags.

Information and systems

Systems to connect

  • ERP
  • WMS
  • carrier portal/API
  • POD store
  • claims system

Context the workflow needs

Order/invoice/load ID, tracking number, dispatched count, POD count, signature image, timestamp, address, claim reason.

What needs to be in place

Carrier document rights, retained PODs, common shipment identifiers and privacy controls.

Human decisions and exceptions

Where people decide

Assess disputed signatures, fraud and liability; contact carrier/customer; approve settlement or rejection.

The approval boundary

Claims owner evaluates liability; no automated denial, refund or signature-authenticity decision.

If something is missing or fails

Missing POD or unreliable identifier routes to manual carrier lookup with explicit evidence gap.

What to measure

  • Complete evidence packs / disputes
  • minutes to assemble / dispute
  • elapsed hours to owner handoff

What to check during evaluation

Test wrong-shipment and cross-account retrieval; monitor missing evidence rates.

Establish today’s baseline and agree acceptance criteria for representative cases, including exceptions. Count review, rework and operating costs alongside the benefit. Time released creates capacity; a financial saving needs a separate mechanism.

Explore it in your business

Which carriers lack searchable PODs? Sample disputed deliveries and separate evidence assembly from negotiation time.

Bring the people who own the process, permitted examples and a clear finish line. Together, we can establish the scope, connections and evidence needed for a useful first deployment.

Keep exploring

Other workflows
around the same work.

Explore orders and supply chain ↗